The Effectiveness Of Using “Nas Daily” Youtube Channel In Improving Speaking Skill
Abstract
The cadets' ability to complete the given language activity and understand the speaking competency constitutes success in speaking English. As a result, the video conference implementation for the Speaking for Formal Interactions course at Ivet University's third-semester cadets in Ship Electrical Engineering has gone off without a hitch. Utilizing different techniques, plans of action, and extra supporting systems like Quizizz, WhatsApp Groups, Zoom Meetings, and others helps with implementation. Speaking professors and cadets also mostly benefit from video conferences in terms of efficacy, ease of connection, technology, and cost rather than experiencing any drawbacks In order to collect the data, a number of approaches, including observation, interviewing, and a questionnaire, were employed to collect the data. The human instrument, observation sheet, questionnaire, and interview guide were study tools at the same time. A technique from Miles and Hubberman (1991) was used to analyze the data that had been gathered. Additionally, the current study used methodological triangulation, which is the use of multiple data-collection techniques, including observation, interview, and questionnaire. In addition to using video conferencing for speaking, the attitudes of the lecturers and the cadets regarding using video conferencing for Speaking for Formal Interactions were also examined. The 15 items in the questionnaire were divided into four categories based on factors including video conferencing efficacy, accessibility, cost, and technology.
References
Alt?ner, C. (2015). Perceptions of undergraduate cadets about synchronous video conference-based english courses. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 627–633. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.589.
Baker, J. (2003). Essential Speaking Skill: a Handbook for English Language Lecturers. New York: Continuum.
Elfaki, N. K., Abdulraheem, I., & Abdulrahim, R. (2019). Impact of e-learning vs traditional learning on cadet?s performance and attitude. International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences, 8(10), 76–82.
Frindt, T. (2007). The impact of video conferencing on distance education courses: A university of Namibia case study. Progressio, 29(1 & 2), 56–68.
Hampel, R. & Stickler, U. (2012). The use of videoconferencing to support multimodal interaction in an online language classroom. ReCALL, 24 (2), 116–137.
Huang, X., & Hu, X. (2016). Lecturers? and Cadets’ Perceptions of Classroom Activities Commonly Used in English Speaking Classes. Higher Education Studies, 6(1), 87–100.
Iino, A., & Yabuta, Y. (2015). The effects of video SCMC on English proficiency, speaking performance and willingness to communicate. In F. Helm, L. Bradley, M. Guarda, & S. Thouësny (Eds), Critical CALL – Proceedings of the 2015 EUROCALL Conference, Padova, Italy (pp. 254-260). Dublin: Research-publishing. net. http://dx.doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2015 .000342.
Jauregi, K., de Graaff, R., van den Bergh, H. & Kriz, M. (2012). Native/nonnative speaker interactions through video-web communication: A clue for enhancing motivation? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(1), 1–19.
Jolliffe, W. (2007). Cooperative learning in the classroom: Putting it into practice. London: Sage Publication Inc.
Kim, J. and Craig, D. (2012). Validation of a video conferenced speaking test. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25, 257.
Loranc-Paszylk, B. (2015). Videoconferencing as a tool for developing speaking skills. In Issues in teaching, learning and testing speaking in a second language (pp. 189-203). Springer.
Martin, M. (2005). Seeing is believing: The role of videoconferencing in distance learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36 (3), 397–405.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M. & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence- based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online-learning studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Oblinger, D. G., & Oblinger, J. L. (2005). Educating the net generation. EDUCAUSE.
Pawlak, M., & Waniek-Klimczak, E. (Eds.). (2014). Issues in teaching, learning and testing speaking in a second language. NY: Springer.
Permatasari, Y. B. (2018). Male and female cadets’ perceptions toward the implementation of video conference as a distance learning media that enhances lecturers? productivities. JALL: Journal of Applied Linguistics and Litercy, 2(2), 101–112.
Satar, M. (2013). Multimodal language learner interactions via desktop videoconferencing within a framework of social presence: Gaze. ReCALL, 25(1), 122–142.
Schiller, J., & Mitchell, J. (1993). Interacting at a distance: Staff and cadet perceptions of teaching and learning via video conferencing. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 9(1), 41–58.
