A Preliminary Study: Why Develop High Order Thinking Skills Worksheets Based on the 3N
Abstract
This qualitative research is a preliminary study of a 4-D model development research that aims to describe the basic problems, student characteristics, the formulation of learning outcomes, and specific learning goals as the initial stage of developing a high order thinking skills (HOTS) exercise bank based on 3N in Algebra. Research subjects at the analysis stage of student characteristics are all students taking Algebra courses in Mathematics Education Department Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa for the 2019/2020 academic year. Data were collected using a literature study, observation, documentation. The data obtained were analyzed descriptively with the following steps: (1) preparing the data, (2) data coding, (3) searching for findings, (4) constructing the framework, and interpreting the data. The results of this study are: (1) Algebra learning centered on lecturers and students has difficulty solving non-routine problems, (2) there are only 1.59% of students who implemented to check the correctness of solutions in solving HOTS problems, (3) CPMK Algebra, and (4) formulation of specific learning goals. These results are used as a reference in the design stage of exercise bank development.
Keywords: high order thinking, exercise bank, problem-solving.
Downloads
References
Andriani, P. (2015). Penalaran Aljabar dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 8(1), 1–13.
Budiati, N., Purnami, A. S., & Agustito, D. (2018). PENERAPAN KONSEP 3N (NITENI, NIROKKE, NAMBAHI) DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Etnomatnesia.
Camac, K. (2018). Student-Centered Approach Vs. Teacher-Centered Approach: Which Is More Effective For A Graduate Data Analytics Course In An E-Learning Environment?
Conklin, W. (2011). Higher-order thinking skills to develop 21st century learners. Teacher Created Materials.
Dr. I Wayan Widana, S.Pd., M. P. (2017). Modul Penyusunan Soal HOTS. 48.
Fan, L., & Zhu, Y. (2007). Representation of problem-solving procedures: A comparative look at China, Singapore, and US mathematics textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 61–75.
Gunawan, I., & Palupi, A. R. (2016). Taksonomi Bloom–revisi ranah kognitif: kerangka landasan untuk pembelajaran, pengajaran, dan penilaian. Premiere Educandum: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, 2(02).
Hendriana, H., Rohaeti, E. E., & Sumarmo, U. (2017). Hard skills dan soft skills matematik siswa. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Hendriana, H., & Soemarmo, U. (2014). Penilaian pembelajaran matematika. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Hendriana, H., & Soemarmo, U. (2017). Penilaian Pembelajaran Matematika Edisi Revisi. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Herbert, M. (1984). Comprehensive School Mathematics Program. Final Evaluation Report.
Herriott, S. R., & Dunbar, S. R. (2009). Who takes college algebra? Primus, 19(1), 74–87.
Ipung Kurniawan Yunianto, I. (2014). JOGJAFORCE: NITENI, NIROKNE, NAMBAHI SEBAGAI PROSES BERPIKIR KREATIF. Jurnal Desain Komunikasi Visual, 2(2), 121–133.
Kaufmann, J. E., & Schwitters, K. L. (2014). Algebra for college students. Nelson Education.
Liljedahl, P., Santos-Trigo, M., Malaspina, U., & Bruder, R. (2016). Problem solving in mathematics education. Springer Nature.
Ma, X., & Wilkins, J. L. M. (2007). Mathematics coursework regulates growth in mathematics achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 230–257.
Mahdayani, R. (2016). Analisis kesulitan siswa dalam pemecahan masalah matematika pada materi aritmatika, aljabar, statistika, dan geometri. Jurnal Pendas Mahakam, 1(1), 86–98.
Mairing, J. P. (2018). Higher Order Thinking Skills Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Struktur Aljabar. Seminar Nasional Riset Inovatif, 6, 139–143.
Muhammad, G. M. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Mahasiswa pada Mata Kuliah Struktur Aljabar II (Teori Gelanggang). PRISMA, 6(1), 66–78.
Nailul, F. (2018). ¬ PENGEMBANGAN SOAL HIGHER ORDER THINKING SKILLS (HOTS) PADA MATERI BARISAN DAN DERET BILANGAN DI SMA NEGERI 1 PURI. Unversitas Islam Majapahit.
No, Permendikbud. (21 C.E.). Tahun 2016. Standar Isi Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah Yang Memuat Tentang Tingkat Kompetensi Dan Kompetensi Inti Sesuai Dengan Jenjang Dan Jenis Pendidika Tertentu.
No, Permenristekdikti. (44 C.E.). Tahun 2015 & Lampiran. Standar Nasiona LPendidikan Tinggi.
No, Perpres. (8 C.E.). tahun 2012 tentang KKNI.
Nuriyatin, S., & Widadah, S. (2018). Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Mahasiswa Calon Guru Dalam Mengajukan Masalah Matematika Sekolah. Unisda Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science (UJMC), 4(1), 19–26.
Pasandaran, R. F. (2019). Representasi Matematika dalam Penyelesaian Masalah Non Rutin. Guru Tua: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 2(1), 45–52.
Polly, D., Margerison, A., & Piel, J. A. (2014). Kindergarten teachers’ orientations to teacher-centered and student-centered pedagogies and their influence on their students’ understanding of addition. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 28(1), 1–17.
Prasetyo, Z. K. (2011). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran sains terpadu untuk meningkatkan kognitif, keterampilan proses, kreativitas serta menerapkan konsep ilmiah peserta didik SMP. Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Raco, J. (n.d.). Metode penelitian kualitatif: jenis, karakteristik dan keunggulannya.
Raharjo, J. F. (2017). Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir Aljabar dan Kemandirian Belajar Mahasiswa melalui Pendekatan Saintifik Model PACE pada Mata Kuliah Struktur Aljabar. JIPMat, 1(2).
Resbiantoro, G., & Nugraha, A. W. (2017). Miskonsepsi mahasiswa pada konsep dasar gaya dan gerak untuk sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains (JPS), 5(2), 80–87.
Riset, P. M. (n.d.). Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi No. 44 Tahun 2015 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi. Diakses Di Http://Pasca. Unila. Ac. Id/Wp-Content/Uploads/2016/01/Permenristekdikti-No-44-Tahun-2015-SN-DIKTI Pdf Pada, 5.
Sariningsih, R., & Kadarisma, G. (2016). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis dan Kemandirian Belajar Siswa SMP Melalui Pendekatan Saintifik berbasis Etnomatematika. P2M STKIP Siliwangi, 3(1), 53–56.
Simanjuntak, E. (n.d.). SIKAP MAHASISWA TERHADAP PEMBELAJARAN ALJABAR LINIER ELEMENTER DENGAN RECIPROCAL TEACHING. INSPIRATIF: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA, 2(1).
Sulistyowati, F., Budiyono, B., & Slamet, I. (2017). Problem Solving Reasoning and Problem Based Instruction in Geometry Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012045
Sulistyowati, F., Kuncoro, K. S., Setiana, D. S., & Purwoko, R. Y. (2019). Solving high order thinking problem with a different way in trigonometry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1315(1), 12001.
Sunarsi, D. (2018). Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Strategik & Karakterisrik Sistem Pendukungnya: Sebuah Tinjauan. Jurnal Ilmiah MEA (Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi), 2(3), 178–194.
Thiagarajan, S. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook.
Utari, S., Heris, H., Ahmad, A., & Anik, Y. (2019). TES DAN SKALA MATEMATIKA BERNUANSA HIGH ORDER THINKING SKILLS. PT Refika Aditama.
Wahyuni, D. (2017). Pengintegrasian Sastra pada Pembelajaran Bahasa Melalui Pendekatan Ilmiah. Madah: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 5(1), 67–80.
Waluyo, M., & Sari, C. K. (2017). Kesalahan Penalaran Dalam Pembuktian Masalah Struktur Aljabar. JIPMat, 2(2).
Werdiningsih, C. E. (2019). Pengaruh Kemandirian Belajar Dan Berpikir Lateral Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Pada Mata Kuliah Struktur Aljabar. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan KALUNI, 2, 222–230. https://doi.org/10.30998/prokaluni.v2i0.65
Woodward, E. (1980). CSMP: A New Alternative in Elementary School Mathematics. The Arithmetic Teacher, 27(6), 20–26.
Yulianti, S. D., Djatmika, E. T., & Santoso, A. (2017). Pendidikan karakter kerja sama dalam pembelajaran siswa sekolah dasar pada kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Teori Dan Praksis Pembelajaran IPS, 1(1), 33–38.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The copyright for all articles belongs to the authors. All other copyright is held by the journal.