The Ability of Proof Using Mathematics Induction Through Cooperative Learning Type Team Assisted Individualization
Abstract
The ability to prove is one of the skills that need to be mastered by pre-service mathematics teachers. One method of proof in mathematics is using mathematical induction. However, from previous research, it is known that they still make common mistakes when proving using mathematical induction. This study aims to determine the difference in increasing the ability to prove using mathematical induction between pre-service teacher Mathematics Education program in IAIN Salatiga who study with cooperative learning type Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) and who receive conventional learning and to determine the size effect of the application of cooperative learning type TAI towards pre-service teachers’ ability to prove using mathematical induction. This research is a quasi-experimental study with a nonequivalent control group design. The population in this study were 107 pre-service mathematics teachers of the Mathematics Education Program of IAIN Salatiga who were taking the Set Logic course. Sampling used the purposive sampling technique and selected class A as the experimental class and class C as the control class. The instrument in this study used essay test questions. Data were analyzed using an independent sample t-test to determine the difference in the average N-Gain of the two sample groups. The results showed the difference in increasing the ability to prove using mathematical induction between a pre-service teacher who received learning through cooperative learning type TAI and a pre-service teacher who received conventional learning. In addition, the size effect of the application of cooperative learning type TAI toward the ability to prove using mathematical induction is categorized as medium.
Keywords: Team Assisted Individualization, Mathematical Proof, Mathematical Induction.
Downloads
References
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (6th ed.). Taylor&Francis e-Library.
Cuoco, A., Manes, M., Levasseur, K., Shteingold, N., & Abrams, J. (2003). Proof. Education Development Center, Inc. http://www2.edc.org/makingmath/mathtools/proof/proof.asp
Ferry, D. (2010). Basic Proof Techniques. https://www.cse.wustl.edu/~cytron/547Pages/f14/IntroToProofs_Final.pdf
Grabiner, J. V. (2012). Why Proof? A Historian’s Perspective. In Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education (Vol. 15, pp. 369–389). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2129-6_20
Herizal, H. (2020). Faktor yang Memengaruhi Kemampuan Pembuktian Matematis Siswa. Vygotsky: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 2(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.30736/vj.v2i1.187
Hernadi, J. (2008). Metoda Pembuktian dalam Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.2.1.295.
Hidayati, I., Deswita, H., & Afri, L. E. (2016). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Teams Assisted Individualization (TAI) terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas VII SMP N 3 Ujung Batu. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2).
Huda, A., Erwina, L., & Isnarto. (2018). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pembuktian Induktif Kelas XII SMA N 7 Semarang pada Materi Induksi Matematika Melalui Pembelajaran Model TAI. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1, 12–17.
Junizon, M. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Extended Triad Level ++ Terhadap Kemampuan Pembuktian Teorema Pada Analisis Real Di Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu . Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia, 4(1), 44–52. https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/index.php/jpmr/article/view/7528/3743
Mathematical Proof Techniques. (2016). OpenDSA Project Contributors. https://www.ida.liu.se/opendsa/Books/TDDC76S19/html/Proofs.html
Meltzer, D. E. (2005). Normalized Learning Gain: a Key Measure of Student Learning. http://www.physicseducation.net/docs/Addendum_on_normalized_gain.pdf
Munir, R. (2010). Matematika Disktrit (3rd ed.). Informatika.
Otten, S., Wambua, M. M., & Govender, rajendran. (2021). Who Should Learn Proving and Why: An Examination of Secondary Mathematics Teachers’ Perspectives. IEJME: International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3). https://www.iejme.com/download/who-should-learn-proving-and-why-an-examination-of-secondary-mathematics-teachers-perspectives-11298.pdf
Shoimin, A. (2014). 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013. Ar-Ruzz Media.
Slavin, R. E. (1984). Team assisted individualization: Cooperative learning and individualized instruction in the mainstreamed classroom. Remedial and Special Education, 5(6), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258400500606
Stefanowicz, A. (2014). Proofs and Mathematical Reasoning. University of Birmingham. https://www.cse.wustl.edu/~cytron/547Pages/f14/IntroToProofs_Final.pdf
Sumardyono. (2018). Kemampuan Guru dalam Menyusun Bukti Matematis. Indonesian Digital Journal of Mathematics and Education, 5(8), 510–522.
Suyitno, A. (2004). Dasar-Dasar dan Proses Pembelajaran Matematika I. UNNES.
Wahab, A., Junaedi, & Azhar, M. (2021). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Statistika Pendidikan Menggunakan Uji Peningkatan N-Gain di PGMI. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(2), 1039–1045. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i2.845
Wardah. (2020). penerapan Pembelajaran Model Kooperatif Tipe Team-Assisted Individualization di SMP. Jurnal Pembelajaran Prospektif, 5(1), 31–40. https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/lp3m/article/view/40637/75676585870
Wijaya, A. A. P., Margiati, K., & Halidjah, S. (2018). Pengaruh Model Team-Assisted Individualization Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas V. JPPK: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khaltulistiwa, 7(9). https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jpdpb/article/view/27801/75676578037
Yurina, W., Melati, H. A., & Hadi, L. (2017). Pengaruh Model Team Assisted Individualization terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa MAteri KSP di SMA. JPPK: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khaltulistiwa, 6(1). https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jpdpb/article/view/18034/15301

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The copyright for all articles belongs to the authors. All other copyright is held by the journal.