Profile of Students’ Argumentation Ability Based On Adversity Quotient In Statistical Problem
Abstract
Argumentative ability can be seen from the argumentation pattern that appears. This pattern needs to be evaluated to look over the quality of the argumentation to make the right problem-solving. This evaluation can be done by recognizing the components that make up the argument. This study goals to describe students' argumentation abilities in solving statistical problem based on Adversity Quotients (AQ). This qualitative descriptive research elaborated 39 students taking a statistical methods course. Subjects were grouped into three types of Adversity Quotient based on the ARP (Adversity Response Profile) questionnaire results. Data were obtained using statistical problem tests and interviews. The outcomes showed three levels of AQ found in students, namely Camper, Toward Climber, and Climber. Camper-type students bring up the Claim-Data-Warrant pattern. Students with AQ levels towards climbers tend to have the same pattern as the Camper type. In comparison, students with the AQ Climber type have a Claim-Data-Warrants-Backing pattern. Based on the outcomes of the study, it can see that students' argumentation skills are determined by the Adversity Quotient level they have when solving statistical problems.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Aaidati, I. F., Subanji, Sulandra, I. M., & Permadi, H. (2022). Student Argumentation Structure in Solving Statistical Problems Based on Adversity Quotient. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 16(2), 121–140.
Abdiyani, S. S., Khabibah, S., & Rahmawati, N. D. (2019). Profil Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa SMP Negeri 1 Jogoroto Berdasarkan Langkah-langkah Polya Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient. Al-Khwarizmi: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 7(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.24256/jpmipa.v7i2.774
Chick, H. L., & Pierce, R. (2012). TEACHING FOR STATISTICAL LITERACY: UTILISING AFFORDANCES IN REAL-WORLD DATA. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(2), 339–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9303-2
Conner, A., Singletary, L. M., Smith, R. C., Wagner, P. A., & Francisco, R. T. (2014). Teacher support for collective argumentation: A framework for examining how teachers support students’ engagement in mathematical activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(3), 401–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9532-8
Gal, I. (2005). Statistical literacy: Meanings, components, responsibilities, the challenge of developing statistical literacy. Reasoning and Thinking, 1, 47–78.
Hastuti, T. D., S, D. R. S., & Riyadi. (2018). Student profile with high adversity quotient in math learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983, 12131. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012131
Hidayat, D. F. (2020). Hubungan kemampuan adversity quotient dan kemandirian belajar terhadap menulis matematis siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika. Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.
Hidayat, W., Wahyudin, & Prabawanto, S. (2018). The mathematical argumentation ability and adversity quotient (AQ) of pre-service mathematics teacher. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(2), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.2.5385.239-248
Indrawati, K. A. D., & Febrilia, B. R. A. (2019). Pola Argumentasi Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Sistem Persamaan Linear Tiga Variabel (Spltv). FIBONACCI: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 5(2), 141. https://doi.org/10.24853/fbc.5.2.141-154
Kartikaningtyas, V., Kusmayadi, T. ., & Riyadi, R. (2018). The Effect of Brain-Based Learning with Contextual Approach Viewed from Adversity Quotient. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1022(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1022/1/012014
Khumairoh, B., Amin, S. M., & Wijayanti, P. (2020). Penalaran Proporsional Siswa Kelas Menengah dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient. Pedagogia?: Jurnal Pendidikan, 9(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v9i1.259
Kim, S., Raza, M., & Seidman, E. (2019). Improving 21st-century teaching skills: The key to effective 21st-century learners. Research in Comparative and International Education, 14, 174549991982921. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499919829214
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage publications.
Moleong, L. J. (2009). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standars for School Mathematics. VA:NCTM.
Pramesti, P., & Rosyidi, A. H. (2020). Profil Argumentasi Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah PISA-like Berdasarkan Model Toulmin. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika (JRPIPM), 3(2), 92. https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpipm.v3n2.p92-101
Putra, R. P., Madawistama, S. T., & Heryani, Y. (2022). Kemampuan argumentasi matematis ditinjau dari adversity quotient. Jurnal Kongruen, 1(2), 175–181. https://publikasi.unsil.ac.id/index.php/kongruen/article/view/206%0Ahttps://publikasi.unsil.ac.id/index.php/kongruen/article/download/206/128
Putra, Z. R. A., & Oktaviane, D. A. K. (2022). ANALISIS HASIL BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATERI EKSPONENSIAL BERDASARKAN TINGKAT ADVERSITY QUOTIENT SISWA. MAJAMATH: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36815/majamath.v5i1
Redhana, I. W. (2019). Mengembangkan Keterampilan Abad Ke-21 Dalam Pembelajaran Kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 13(1).
Riki Andriatna, & Kurniawati, I. (2021). Analisis Level Literasi Statistik Mahasiswa Calon Guru Matematika. Transformasi?: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 5(2), 619–632. https://doi.org/10.36526/tr.v5i2.1497
Septianingtyas, N., & Jusra, H. (2020). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Adversity Quotient. Jurnal Cendekia?: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2 SE-Articles). https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v4i2.263
Setiawan, E. P., & Sukoco, H. (2021). Exploring first year university students’ statistical literacy: A case on describing and visualizing data. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(3), 427–448. https://doi.org/10.22342/JME.12.3.13202.427-448
Soekisno, R. B. A. (2015). Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Matematis Mahasiswa. Infinity Journal, 4(2), 120. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v4i2.77
Soulé, H., & Warrick, T. (2015). Defining 21st century readiness for all students: What we know and how to get there. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 178–186. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000017
Stoltz, P. G. (2000). Adversity Quotient Mengubah Hambatan Menjadi Peluang. PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
Sukmaningrum, R., & Kurniasari, I. (2022). Profile of student’s algebraic thinking in solving mathematics problems reviewing from adversity quotient. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(2), 252–259. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v17i2.3349
Abdiyani, S. S., Khabibah, S., & Rahmawati, N. D. (2019). Profil Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa SMP Negeri 1 Jogoroto Berdasarkan Langkah-langkah Polya Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient. Al-Khwarizmi: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 7(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.24256/jpmipa.v7i2.774
Chick, H. L., & Pierce, R. (2012). TEACHING FOR STATISTICAL LITERACY: UTILISING AFFORDANCES IN REAL-WORLD DATA. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(2), 339–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9303-2
Conner, A., Singletary, L. M., Smith, R. C., Wagner, P. A., & Francisco, R. T. (2014). Teacher support for collective argumentation: A framework for examining how teachers support students’ engagement in mathematical activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(3), 401–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9532-8
Gal, I. (2005). Statistical literacy: Meanings, components, responsibilities, the challenge of developing statistical literacy. Reasoning and Thinking, 1, 47–78.
Hastuti, T. D., S, D. R. S., & Riyadi. (2018). Student profile with high adversity quotient in math learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983, 12131. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012131
Hidayat, D. F. (2020). Hubungan kemampuan adversity quotient dan kemandirian belajar terhadap menulis matematis siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika. Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.
Hidayat, W., Wahyudin, & Prabawanto, S. (2018). The mathematical argumentation ability and adversity quotient (AQ) of pre-service mathematics teacher. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(2), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.2.5385.239-248
Indrawati, K. A. D., & Febrilia, B. R. A. (2019). Pola Argumentasi Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Sistem Persamaan Linear Tiga Variabel (Spltv). FIBONACCI: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 5(2), 141. https://doi.org/10.24853/fbc.5.2.141-154
Kartikaningtyas, V., Kusmayadi, T. ., & Riyadi, R. (2018). The Effect of Brain-Based Learning with Contextual Approach Viewed from Adversity Quotient. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1022(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1022/1/012014
Khumairoh, B., Amin, S. M., & Wijayanti, P. (2020). Penalaran Proporsional Siswa Kelas Menengah dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient. Pedagogia?: Jurnal Pendidikan, 9(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v9i1.259
Kim, S., Raza, M., & Seidman, E. (2019). Improving 21st-century teaching skills: The key to effective 21st-century learners. Research in Comparative and International Education, 14, 174549991982921. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499919829214
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage publications.
Moleong, L. J. (2009). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standars for School Mathematics. VA:NCTM.
Pramesti, P., & Rosyidi, A. H. (2020). Profil Argumentasi Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah PISA-like Berdasarkan Model Toulmin. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika (JRPIPM), 3(2), 92. https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpipm.v3n2.p92-101
Putra, R. P., Madawistama, S. T., & Heryani, Y. (2022). Kemampuan argumentasi matematis ditinjau dari adversity quotient. Jurnal Kongruen, 1(2), 175–181. https://publikasi.unsil.ac.id/index.php/kongruen/article/view/206%0Ahttps://publikasi.unsil.ac.id/index.php/kongruen/article/download/206/128
Putra, Z. R. A., & Oktaviane, D. A. K. (2022). ANALISIS HASIL BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATERI EKSPONENSIAL BERDASARKAN TINGKAT ADVERSITY QUOTIENT SISWA. MAJAMATH: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36815/majamath.v5i1
Redhana, I. W. (2019). Mengembangkan Keterampilan Abad Ke-21 Dalam Pembelajaran Kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 13(1).
Riki Andriatna, & Kurniawati, I. (2021). Analisis Level Literasi Statistik Mahasiswa Calon Guru Matematika. Transformasi?: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 5(2), 619–632. https://doi.org/10.36526/tr.v5i2.1497
Septianingtyas, N., & Jusra, H. (2020). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Adversity Quotient. Jurnal Cendekia?: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2 SE-Articles). https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v4i2.263
Setiawan, E. P., & Sukoco, H. (2021). Exploring first year university students’ statistical literacy: A case on describing and visualizing data. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(3), 427–448. https://doi.org/10.22342/JME.12.3.13202.427-448
Soekisno, R. B. A. (2015). Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Matematis Mahasiswa. Infinity Journal, 4(2), 120. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v4i2.77
Soulé, H., & Warrick, T. (2015). Defining 21st century readiness for all students: What we know and how to get there. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 178–186. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000017
Stoltz, P. G. (2000). Adversity Quotient Mengubah Hambatan Menjadi Peluang. PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
Sukmaningrum, R., & Kurniasari, I. (2022). Profile of student’s algebraic thinking in solving mathematics problems reviewing from adversity quotient. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(2), 252–259. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v17i2.3349
Published
2023-01-29
How to Cite
PUTRA, Zuhadur Ra'is Ariyono et al.
Profile of Students’ Argumentation Ability Based On Adversity Quotient In Statistical Problem.
Journal of Medives : Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 1, p. 106 - 116, jan. 2023.
ISSN 2549-5070.
Available at: <https://e-journal.ivet.ac.id/index.php/matematika/article/view/2330>. Date accessed: 27 july 2025.
doi: https://doi.org/10.31331/medivesveteran.v7i1.2330.
Issue
Section
Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The copyright for all articles belongs to the authors. All other copyright is held by the journal.
