Students’ Cognition of The Induction Step in Proving Inequality Propositions
Abstract
The induction step in proof by induction requires some clever tricks in order to get the expected formula for , especially in statements with inequalities. The purpose of this study was to determine undergraduate students’ cognition regarding the induction step in proving inequality propositions in order to create opportunities to teach the principle of mathematical induction better. A class of 67 students participated in the study on learning proof by induction using the problem-based approach. The Action-Process-Object-Schema theory was used to structure the study and the cyclic activities-class-discussion-exercises instructional approach was used to teach proof by induction. Data for the study was comprised of individual students’ written responses to a task of two questions and the transcriptions of the semi-structured interviews. The findings revealed that students at most showed indication of partial understanding of proof by induction. Executing the induction step sits at the heart of proof by induction and necessitates logical reasoning at the object-level conception. Inadvertently, the implication was the most challenging aspect in proof by induction. The majority of students made inroads in setting up the proof properly but could not succeed in proving that . Some students had challenges of where to begin a proof, so much that they chose to start with direct substitution. In line with that, most students also concluded without deriving the expected formula required to draw a conclusion.
Keywords: induction step; proof by induction; APOS-ACE teaching cycles; inequalities.
Downloads
References
Arnon, I., Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Oktac, A., Fuentes, S.R., Trigueros, M., & Weller, K. (2014). APOS theory: A framework for research and curriculum development in mathematics education. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
Ashkenazi, Y., & Itzkovitch, E. (2014). Proof by Mathematical Induction. International Journal of Innovation and Research in Educational Sciences, 1(3), 2349-5219.
Dubinsky, E. (1986). Teaching mathematical induction I. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 5, 305–317.
Asiala, M., Brown, A., DeVries, D., Dubinsky, E., Mathews, D., & Thomas, K. (1996). A framework for research and curriculum development in undergraduate mathematics education. In J. Kaput, A. H. Schoenfeld, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education II (pp. 1–32). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Borji, V., Alamolhodaei, H., & Radmehr, F. (2018). Application of the APOS-ACE Theory to Improve Students’ Graphical Understanding of Derivative. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 2947-2967. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/91451
Borji, V., & Voskoglou, G.R. (2017). Designing an ACE Approach for Teaching the Polar Coordinates. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(3), 303-309. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-5-3-11
Dubinsky, E. (1986). Teaching mathematical induction I. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 5, 305-317.
Dubinsky, E. (1990). Teaching mathematical induction II. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 8, 285–304.
Dubinsky E., Mcdonald M.A. (2001). APOS: A Constructivist Theory of Learning in Undergraduate Mathematics Education Research. In: Holton D., Artigue M., Kirchgräber U., Hillel J., Niss M., Schoenfeld A. (eds) The Teaching and Learning of Mathematics at University Level. New ICMI Study Series, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47231-7_25
Ernest, P. (1984). Mathematical induction: A pedagogical discussion. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305895
García-Martíneza, I., & Parraguezb, M. (2017). The basic step in the construction of the principle of mathematical induction is based on APOS theory. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 46, 128-143.
Hine, G. (2017). Proof by mathematical induction: Professional practice for secondary teachers. 26th Biennial Conference of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers.
Inglis, M. (2011). Review of "Proof in Mathematics Education: Research, Learning and Teaching". Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Ndlovu, Z., & Brijlall, D. (2015). Pre-service Teachers’ Mental Constructions of Concepts in Matrix Algebra. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(2), 156–171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2015.1028717
Palla, M., Potari, D., & Spyrou, P. (2012). Secondary school students’ understanding of mathematical induction: structural characteristics and the process of proof construction. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 1023-1045.
Radu, I., & Weber, K. (2011). Refinements in mathematics undergraduate students' reasoning on completed infinite iterative processes. Educational Studises in Mathematics, 78, 165-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649- 011-9318-1
Salgado, H., Trigueros, M. (2015). Teaching eigenvalues and eigenvectors using models and APOS Theory. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 39, 100–120.
Stylianides, G.J., Stylianides, A.J., & Philippou, G.N. (2007). Preservice teachers’ knowledge of proof by mathematical induction. Journal of Math Teacher Education, 10, 145-166.
Trigueros, M., & Martínez-Planell, R. (2010). Geometrical representations in the learning of two-variable functions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73, 3–19.
Voskoglou, M.G. (2013). An Application of the APOS/ACE Approach in Teaching the Irrational Numbers. Journal of Mathematical Sciences & Mathematics Education, 8(1), 30-47.
Weller, K., Clark, J., Dubinsky, E., Loch, S., McDonald, M., & Merkovsky, R. (2003). Student performance and attitudes in courses based on APOS Theory and the ACE Teaching Cycle. In A. Selden, E. Dubinsky, G. Harel, & F. Hitt (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education V (pp. 97–131). Providence: American Mathematical Society.
Weyer, R. (2010). APOS theory is a conceptualization for understanding mathematical learning. Summation: Mathematics and Computer Science Scholarship at Ripon 3, 9-15.
Yin, R.K. (2014). Case study research: design and methods (5th Ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The copyright for all articles belongs to the authors. All other copyright is held by the journal.
