Profil of Students’ Mathematical Literacy in Solving AKM Task in Terms of Personality Types
Abstract
Mathematical literacy is an individual’s ability to formulate, employ, and interpret mathematics in various contexts. AKM is one of the government's efforts to measure students' mathematical literacy. This research is a descriptive research with a qualitative approach that aims to describe the profile of students' mathematical literacy in solving AKM in terms of the melancholic, choleric, phlegmatic, and sanguine personality types. The instrument used are personality type questionnaire, mathematical literacy test, and interview guidelines. The results showed that (1) melancholic students wrote complete information, construct mathematical models, used efficient and structured strategies, performed calculations correctly, interpreted and double-checked answers as a whole; (2) choleric students wrote complete information, did not make mathematical models, used structured strategies, performed calculations correctly, interpreted and re-checked answers, but were less careful so the units used were not appropriate; (3) phlegmatic students wrote complete information, construct mathematical models, used quick strategies, interpreted and re-checked calculations, but were less careful so the calculations were not accurate; (4) Sanguine students did not write down known information, did not make mathematical models, used quick strategies, interpreted solutions, but did not re-check answers so the calculations were inaccurate. Therefore, personality type is one of the factors that cause differences in mathematical literacy.
Keywords : mathematical literacy, akm, personality type.
Downloads
References
Fachrudin, A. D., Ekawati, R., Kohar, A. W., Widadah, S., Kusumawati, I. B., & Setianingsih, R. (2019). Ancient China history-based task to support students’ geometrical reasoning and mathematical literacy in learning Pythagoras. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1417(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1417/1/012042.
Fauziah, A., Sobari, E. F. D., & Robandi, B. (2021). Analisis Pemahaman Guru Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP) Mengenai Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum (AKM). Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu …, 3(4), 1550–1558. https://www.edukatif.org/index.php/edukatif/article/view/608.
Kemendikbud. (2020). Desain Pengembangan Soal Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum. Desain Pengembangan AKM, 1–125.
Littauere, F. (2011). Personality plus. In Dr.Lyndon Saputra (Ed.), Karism publishing Group (revisi). Kharisma Publishing Group.
Masriyah, & Firmansyah, M. H. (2018). Students’ Mathematical Literacy in Solving PISA Problems Based on Keirsey Personality Theory. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 953(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/953/1/012203
Mendikbud. (2020). AKM dan Implikasinya pada Pembelajaran. Pusat Asesmen Dan Pembelajaran Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Dan Perbukuan Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1–37.
Nizham, H., Suhendra, S., & Avip, B. (2017). Improving ability mathematic literacy, self-efficacy and reducing mathematical anxiety with learning Treffinger model at senior high school students. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 2(1), 130. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v2i1.16696
OECD. (n.d.). PISA 2018 Result. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/pisa-2018-results.htm
OECD. (2010). Dense beds of Ophiura sarsii limited by food supply in the Sea of Japan. In Echinoderms: Durham - Proceedings of the 12th International Echinoderm Conference. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203869543-c92
OECD. (2017). PISA for Development Assessment and Analytical Framework. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-for-development-assessment-and-analytical-framework_9789264305274-en
OECD. (2018). Pisa 2021 Mathematics Framework ( Draft ). November 2018. https://pisa2021-maths.oecd.org/files/PISA 2021 Mathematics Framework Draft.pdf
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. In OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264190511-en.pdf?expires=1569847112&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=08AEA3FD9105123D4555A383BD097B5E
Ojose, B. (2011). Mathematics Literacy: Are We Able to Put the Mathematics We Learn into Everyday Use? Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 89–100.
Pakpahan, R. (2016). Faktor-Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Capaian Literasi Matematika Siswa Indonesia Dalam Pisa 2012 Factors Affecting Literacy Mathematics Achievement of Indonesian Student in Pisa 2012. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1(3), 331–347. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/194451291.pdf
Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran, & Litbang Kemdikbud RI. (2021). Asesmen Nasional: Lembar Tanya Jawab. Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1–32. https://hasilun.puspendik.kemdikbud.go.id/akm/file_akm_202101_1.pdf
Rashedi, M., & Abolmaali, K. (2014). The relationship between personality characteristics and the psycho-social climate of the classroom in the engagement of high school students studying mathematics. Sciences, 1(5), 225–234.
Rosita, A. (2018). Discovery Learning - PMRI in Improving Mathematics Literacy of Junior High School Students. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 7(1), 35–39.
Rusmining, S.B.Waluyo, & Sugianto. (2014). Analysis of Mathematics Literacy , Learning Constructivism and Character Education. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(8), 331–340.
Sari, D. R., Rijal, M., Muharram, W., Pendidikan, U., & Kampus, I. (2021). SOAL Geometri Pada Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum-Numerasi Sekolah Dasar. 5(September), 153–162.
Sugiarto, I. J., Usodo, B., Retno, D., & Saputro, S. (2020). International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding Mathematic Literacy Ability of Choleric and Singuins Personality of High School Students. 26–32.
Suharta, I. G. P., & Suarjana, I. M. (2018). A case study on mathematical literacy of prospective elementary school teachers. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 413–424. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11228a
Sutisna, A. P., Budi, A. S., & Noornia, A. (2018). The Influence of the Realistic Mathematics Education Approach and Early Mathematical Ability to Mathematical Literacy. International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Research, 6(04), 798–801. https://doi.org/10.14741/ijmcr/v.6.4.18
Umbara, U., & Suryadi, D. (2019). Re-interpretation of mathematical literacy based on the teacher’s perspective. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 789–806. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12450a
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The copyright for all articles belongs to the authors. All other copyright is held by the journal.
